Legal Opinion

Darst v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 28, 2003No. Nos. 5D00-2262, 5D00-2459PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

UPON REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT

2Per curiam

The supreme court has quashed our decision in Darst v. State, 816 So.2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), and has remanded the case to this court. State v. Darst, 837 So.2d 394 (Fla.2002). The supreme court’s rationale for its decision is explained in Mills v. State, 822 So.2d 1284 (Fla.2002).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and downward departure sentence.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Darst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. State v. DarstSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sellers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003