Legal Opinion
Darst v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 28, 2003No. Nos. 5D00-2262, 5D00-2459PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
UPON REMAND FROM SUPREME COURT
2Per curiam
The supreme court has quashed our decision in Darst v. State, 816 So.2d 680 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), and has remanded the case to this court. State v. Darst, 837 So.2d 394 (Fla.2002). The supreme court’s rationale for its decision is explained in Mills v. State, 822 So.2d 1284 (Fla.2002).
Accordingly, we affirm the conviction and downward departure sentence.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J., PETERSON and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Darst v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. DarstSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
4Cited by1 opinion
- Sellers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003