Jackson v. State

*180OPINION

Appellant has been convicted as an habitual criminal under NRS 207.010.

The first assignment of error is that only the district attorney himself, and not a deputy, may authorize the institution of proceedings under NRS 207.010. If there were any merit to this contention, it was waived by failure to move to dismiss under NRS 174.075(2). Ex Parte Esden, 55 Nev. 169, 28 P.2d 132 (1934).

The second assignment of error is that it was not clearly established that appellant Robert Jackson was the same Robert Jackson named in the exemplified copies of prior convictions.

During the habitual status…