Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Willis
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
The Arkansas Court sAppeals tice. captioned case to this court pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. l-2(b)(2) and (5). We accepted certification in order to determine whether the defenses of collateral estoppel or res judicata bar a paternity action against a third party following the entry of two divorce decrees that reflect inconsistent findings on the issue of the child’s paternity. We decline to reach the merits of this appeal because the trial court order did not cover all of the parties and their respective claims as required by Ark. R. Civ. P. 54(b).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shackelford v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Maroney v. City of MalvernSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- State v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Dodge v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Jacobs v. CollisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Toland v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
- Overturff v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.