Gilmore v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellant was charged with the crime of aggravated battery. He pled a defense of temporary insanity. He was found guilty as charged, convicted and sentenced.
On appeal, the appellant argues that the only evidence in the record was that he was insane at the time the criminal incident occurred and, therefore, he was entitled to a judgment of acquittal or a directed verdict, citing Blocker v. State, 87 Fla. 128, 99 So. 250 (1924); Farrell v. State, 101 So.2d 130 (Fla.1958).
The above cited authorities are found not to be applicable in the instant case, because there were lay eye witnesses who…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Byrd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Farrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Brady v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- French v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Blocker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clarence Williams v. Louis L. Wainwright, as Secretary, Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981