Legal Opinion

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. United States Food And Drug Administration

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided January 13, 2025No. 6:20-cv-00176Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:20-cv-00176 R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. Food & Drug Administration et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs challenge an FDA rule that requires cigarette pack- aging and advertising to bear health warnings that have both graphical and textual components. Tobacco Products; Required Warnings for Cigarette Packages and Advertisements,

85 Fed. Reg. 15,638

(Mar. 18, 2020). Plaintiffs raise the following claims: (1) the warnings go beyond purely factual, uncontroversial mat- ters of the sort that the First…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. FCC v. Prometheus Radio ProjectSupreme Court of the United States · 2021

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API