Legal Opinion

Pourciau v. Angelloz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1913No. 19,136Published

tAppeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Iberville; L. B. Claiborne, Judge. Action by L. Enomie Pourciau against Arthur H. Angelloz, wherein the L. Baist Cooperage Company, Limited, filed intervention and third opposition. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

LAND, J.

[1] The total of costs, taxes, and penalties due on the N. 14 of the S. E. 14 *1011of section 41 amounted to $40.22. Defendant tendered $58.41 to redeem the N. W. % and the S. E. % of section 41. Plaintiff refused to accept the tender, without assigning any reasons for his action. As a litigant the plaintiff contends that the defendant had no legal right to redeem the S. E. % of section 41, and therefore his offer to redeem the N.' W. Yi and the S. E. Yi of said section was not warranted by the statute.

The Constitution provides that property sold for taxes shall be redeemable…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howcott v. SmartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API