Vincent v. Hansen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Manistee; McMahon, J. Replevin by William Vincent against John Hansen. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The Reeder Bros. Shoe Company brought replevin against Carpentier for goods which the formexsold to the latter in May, 1895, claiming that they were procured through fraxxd. The action was commenced on December 4, 1895, on which day the Reeder Bros. Shoe Company received the goods from the sheriff, and gave the statutory bond. On the same day or the next, the Reeder Bros. Shoe Company sold these goods to Hansen, the defendant, from whom they were replevied by the plaintiff, December 5, 1895. The plaintiff’s claim is based on two chattel mortgages, one of which was given him *174by Carpentier on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burt v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bronson Electric Co. v. RheubottomMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Luther v. KinionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1918
- Kops Bros. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- New York Central Railroad v. Hayes Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927