Legal Opinion
Vizvary v. Vignati
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided June 15, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-0551BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
JACOB HAGOPIAN, United States Magistrate.
The instant matters have been referred to the United States Magistrate for Findings and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636. All four defendants, Francis C. Vignati (Vignati), Thomas Austin (Austin), Joseph Martino (Martino), and Burton A. Greenspan (Greenspan) have moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R. Civ.P. 12(b)(2). In addition, Vignati has moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, improper venue, and failure to state a claim upon which relief can…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Emiliano Valencia-CopeteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Paterson-Leitch Company, Inc. v. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Junco Mulet v. Junco De La FuenteDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2002
- Marchuk v. LongDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025