Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 13, 1997No. 88192PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

We have for review a decision certifying the following question to be of great public importance:

IS THE RULE IN STATE v. DAVIS, 630 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994), REQUIRING WRITTEN REASONS FOR DEPARTURE WHEN COMBINING NONSTATE PRISON SANCTIONS, APPLICABLE UNDER THE 1994 SENTENCING GUIDELINES?

Perry v. State, 673 So.2d 557 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const.

We answered this question in State v. Simmons, 687 So.2d 827 (Fla.1997). There we wrote:

[T]he 1994 guidelines, contain no disjunctive wording and require new interpretation. Florida Rule of Criminal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Laizure v. Avante at Leesburg, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Chames v. DeMayoSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. McKenzie Check Advance of Florida, LLC v. BettsSupreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API