Legal Opinion

Gilman v. McArdle

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

— This is an equitable action brought by Michael Gilman, as administrator of the estate of James *331Gilman, deceased, and its object is to have a certain trust declared null and void, and to compel the defendant, as the alleged trustee, to account.

On the 23d of August, 1882, Margaret Gilman, then about eighty-five years old, placed about $2,300 of money belonging to her into the hands of the defendant, with the direction and upon the condition that, after the death of herself and her husband, who was then over ninety years of age, the defendant should use the money, in the first place, to pay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. . FunkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Gott v. CookNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. Barnes v. . UnderwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Roosevelt v. EllithorpNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  5. Lockwood v. StockholmNew York Court of Chancery · 1844

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of NegusNew York Surrogate's Court · 1899
  2. Robins v. McClureNew York Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API