Legal Opinion

Thibodeaux v. Thibodeaux

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1989No. W89-46PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WRIT GRANTED AND MADE PEREMPTORY:

The trial court erred in ordering defendant-relator, Emery Thibodeaux, to answer all questions propounded to relator at the oral deposition and in the written interrogatories. U.S. Const. amends. V and XIV, Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 94 S.Ct. 316, 38 L.Ed.2d 274 (1973). The record in this case clearly indicates that certain of the questions propounded to the relator could result in the relator incriminating himself in criminal activity if he were required to respond. The correct procedure for the trial court to follow in the instant case is to review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Louisiana Livestock Sanitary Board v. PickettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JODY DWAYNE KOPNICKY VERSUS CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION Consolidated With JONATHAN WIELEY ALEX VERSUS CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATIONLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API