Legal Opinion

In re: Courtney Wild

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 14, 2020No. 19-13843PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Case: 19-13843 Date Filed: 04/14/2020 Page: 1 of 120 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-13843 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:08-cv-80736-KAM In re: COURTNEY WILD, Petitioner. ________________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (April 14, 2020) Before NEWSOM, TJOFLAT, and HULL, Circuit Judges. NEWSOM, Circuit Judge: This case, which is before us on a petition for writ of mandamus, arises out of a civil suit…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Courtney WildCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
  2. Green v. Graham (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Joe v. Capital Link Management, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API