Legal Opinion

Flaum v. Middlebury, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1980No. 36774PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Justice.

This is a quiet title action. Code Ann. § 37-1411. The trial court granted appellee’s motion for partial summary judgment, ruling that a reversionary clause in a deed was invalid. That clause states: “The Grantee, its heir’s, successors and assigns do expressly agree that should the aforedescribed property not be used for roadway purposes then in that event, said property shall revert to the Grantor.”

Under our law this reversionary clause is valid. The clause creates a limitation upon the estate conveyed; namely, that the estate is vested in the grantee while it is used for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Department of Transportation v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  3. Moore v. WellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  4. Georgia, Ashburn, Sylvester & Camilla Railway Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Fennell v. FoskeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlanta Development Authority v. Clark Atlanta University, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Brittain v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  3. Mann v. BlalockSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  4. SEA ISLAND COMPANY, LLC v. JANE FRASERCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API