Legal Opinion

State v. Grenier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 28, 1992No. 90-313PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendant John Grenier appeals his conviction for lewd and lascivious conduct, 13 V.S.A. § 2601. He argues that the trial court erred (1) in failing to instruct the jury that lewd and lascivious conduct is a specific-intent crime, (2) in instructing the jury on lewd and lascivious conduct as a lesser-included offense of sexual assault, (3) in allowing testimony that should have been excluded under V.R.E. 404(b), and (4) in failing to strike part of the presentence report after defendant objected to its accuracy under V.R.Cr.P. 32(c)(4). We affirm the conviction, but agree with defendant on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CatsamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. State v. BruyetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. United States v. Douglas R. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. State v. KerrSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. John DiscolaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. State v. VanDusenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  4. State v. MaunsellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. State v. NguyenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API