Legal Opinion

Fernow v. Gould

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 11, 2012No. A11-1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

In a personal-injury action arising out of a collision between a city snowplow and respondent-plaintiffs vehicle, respondent insurer intervened and also submitted to inter-company arbitration its claim for indemnification for basic economic loss benefits that it paid to respondent-plaintiff. An arbitrator ruled that governmental statutory immunity did not apply and that respondent insurer should be indemnified. Appellants moved to vacate the award. The district court denied the motion to vacate and confirmed the arbitrator’s award. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Schroeder v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Programmed Land, Inc. v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Klinefelter v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fernow v. GouldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API