Legal Opinion

Garland v. Charleston Naval Shipyard Federal Credit Union

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 12, 1989No. 1351Published

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

Andrea L. Taylor Garland brought this action alleging several causes of action against the Charleston Naval Shipyard Federal Credit Union (“Credit Union”), the Life Insurance ■ Company of North America (“INA”), and the Freimark & Thurston Agency, Inc. (“Freimark & Thurs-ton”). Her action seeks, among other things, to recover the face amount of an accidental death insurance policy allegedly purchased by her husband, Garry J. Taylor, before his accidental death. The trial court, however, sitting without a jury, found in favor of the three defendants. Garland appeals. We affirm.

FAC…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hodge v. National Fidelity Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. MittelhauserSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. National Foundation Life Insurance Co. v. WellingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Clarke v. Home Fund Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  5. Weeks v. Pilot Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API