Baca v. Trejo
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jorgensen
Defendant, Armando Trejo, appeals from the grant of default judgment against him and in favor of plaintiff, Gustavo Baca. The only issue is the timeliness of defendant’s motion to vacate the default, which he sent via UPS on the thirtieth day after the court entered the judgment, but which the court received on the thirty-fifth day. Defendant asserts that a mailbox rule applies to his consignment of the motion to UPS, making its filing timely. We disagree. As defendant’s motion was untimely, his notice of appeal was also untimely. We therefore dismiss his appeal.
On August 10, 2007, plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Harrisburg-Raleigh Airport Authority v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- A. S. Schulman Electric Co. v. Village of Fox LakeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Tolve v. Ogden Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- Holesinger v. Dubuque Feeder Pig Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gruszeczka v. The Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- Shatku v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Hanson v. De Kalb County State's Attorney's OfficeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- BLTREJV3 Chicago, LLC v. Kane County Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- BLTREJV3 Chicago, LLC v. The Kane County Board of ReviewAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.