Legal Opinion
Curtis Green v. Phillip Frazier
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided September 19, 2022No. 2021 SC 0293Unknown
1Opinion of the Court
RENDERED: SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2021-SC-0293-DG CURTIS GREEN AND CLAY GREEN, INC. APPELLANTS D/B/A GREEN’S TOYOTA OF LEXINGTON AND JOHN HICKS ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2020-CA-0781 POWELL CIRCUIT COURT NO. 19-CI-00246 PHILLIP FRAZIER APPELLEE OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUSTICE VANMETER REVERSING AND REMANDING Parties who enter enforceable arbitration agreements are required to submit their disputes to binding arbitration, subject to limited exceptions, under both federal and Kentucky statutes. In this case, Phillip Frazier signed or initialed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Ping v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
- Charlene Jenkins, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. First American Cash Advance of Georgia, Llc, First National Bank in BrookingsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.