Legal Opinion

People v. Watson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 2001No. 2 — 00—0188PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rapp

Following a jury trial, defendant, Troy Watson, was convicted of residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19 — 3(a) (West 1998)). Because defendant had previously been convicted of two Class 2 felonies, he was eligible for a sentence in the Class X range (see 730 ILCS 5/5 — 5— 3(c)(8) (West 1998)), and the trial court sentenced him to 16 years’ imprisonment. Defendant appeals, contending that his Class X sentence is unconstitutional because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the prior felony convictions that were the basis of the enhanced sentence.

Evidence at defendant’s trial showed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. ForbesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  5. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. HillAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. People v. FikaraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. YancyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. BlanksAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API