Legal Opinion
Faucett v. Northern Clay Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 12, 1915No. 12314PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered July 6, 1914, in favor of the plaintiff, upon dismissing defendant’s cross-complaint, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
On January the 24th, 1910, the respondent and appellant entered into a contract of which the following is a copy:
“It is agreed between James E. Faucett, a bachelor of Auburn, King county, Washington, and the Northern Clay Company, a corporation of the city of Auburn, that in consideration of the mutual agreements of said parties:
“(1) James E. Faucett consents to the sub-leasing of the tract of land hereinafter described from Buichiro Itabashi, a Japanese of said city of Auburn to said Northern Clay Company until and including the 8th day of March, 1914, and said James E. Faucett waives the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boston Clothing Co. v. SolbergWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ellis v. WadleighWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Warner v. Channell Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Luther v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Keys v. KlittenWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Finch v. King Solomon Lodge No. 60Washington Supreme Court · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.