Legal Opinion

Davis v. Town of Bonaparte

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1908PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Van Bu-ren District Court.— ITon. F. W. Eiciielberger, Judge. Action at law to recover damages received upon wliat is claimed to be one of the streets of defendant town. At tbe conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence tbe trial court on motion directed a verdict for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

Defendant Oresap is tbe owner of a building in tbe town of Bonaparte, and during tbe time material to our inquiry defendant McDavitt was bis tenant occupying and managing tbe property. Eastward from tbe *198building some ten or twelve feet from Water street, and extending into what plaintiff claims is a street, is a cellar-way eight feet and four inches 'from the building. This cellarway was covered by a double door, but on the evening in question one of these doors had been left open by defendant McDavitt. On the night of December 1, 1905, plaintiff, while passing along one of the streets of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keyes v. City of Cedar FallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Manderschid v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Stevens v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Daniels v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  5. Cahill v. LaytonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mann v. Des Moines Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  3. Culver v. ConverseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  4. Bangert v. Osceola CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  5. Dugan v. ZurmuehlenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API