Legal Opinion

Peelle Co. v. Industrial Plant Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 22, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This is the appeal of the defendant below in an action in replevin from a judgment entered upon plaintiff’s verdict against defendant.

The evidence was in many essential respects in sharp conflict, but it nevertheless justified the jury in finding, if they saw fit, the following matters of fact among others:

On December 7th, 1934, the plaintiff, Peelle Company, a corporation, bought a locomotive from one Murray- E. Baker, trading as Baker Machine and Supply Company, and received from Baker a bill of sale therefor. The locomotive weighed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Beatty v. ParsonsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1911
  3. Hunt v. MartinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1843

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jason's Foods, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Seneca v. BissellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  3. August Uribe Fine Art, LLC v. Dartmilano SRL, Pier Giulio Lanza, Riccardo Manfrin, Maria Stellina Marescalchi, Fracassi Worldwide Shipping SRL, Oblyon Group, LLC, and Art Lending, Inc.; Sotheby’s, Inc. v. Dartmilano SRL, Pier Giulio Lanza, Riccardo Manfrin, and Art Lending, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API