Legal Opinion

United States v. Tankersley

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 5, 2003No. 4:03CR3000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation (filing 24), and on Defendant’s objections thereto (fifing 30).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4, I have conducted a de novo review of the report and recommendation, and I find that it should be adopted. Inasmuch as Magistrate Judge Piester has fully, carefully and correctly found the facts and applied the law, I need only state that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (filing 14) should be denied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:

1) The Magistrate Judge’s report and…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. People v. BalderasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Aaron M. Deroo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State of Iowa v. Nathan Daniel OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  3. Amended September 4, 2014 State of Iowa v. Nathan Daniel OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Jennings v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. State of Iowa v. Nathan Daniel OlsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API