Legal Opinion

Richardson v. . Debnam

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1876Published

1Opinion of the Court

This case is clearly distinguishable from Green v. Hobgood, 74 N.C. 234. There it did not appear that notice of appeal was communicated to the plaintiff either before or at the trial. Here the notice was given to the plaintiff at or immediately before the trial, by the trial magistrate, who was instructed by the defendant to enter the appeal in case the judgment was against him. When the parties are present at the trial a verbal notice of appeal is sufficient. For the purpose of notice the magistrate was the agent of the defendant, made such by the instructions of the defendant as to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. State v. . GriffisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. . CrouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Green v. . HobgoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API