Legal Opinion
Union Car Advertising Co. v. Collier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 24, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO'Malley, J.
The complaint sounds in tort. The first two causes of action are predicated upon defendants’ wrongful interference with an alleged consummated contract; the third, upon wrongful prevention of an award of the same contract to plaintiff. As the complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the question presented is whether plaintiff established a prima facie case with respect to all, or any of such causes of action. An outline of facts essential to the determination of the question follows:
The plaintiff, a New York corporation, is engaged in the car advertising business. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- McDonald v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Lewis v. BloedeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Knapp v. Rochester Dog Protective Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Starling Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940