Legal Opinion

Akeem K. Jackson v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2016No. ED102702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., Judge

Introduction

Akeem K. Jackson (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion without an eviden-tiary hearing, arguing his motion alleged facts showing there was an insufficient factual basis for his guilty plea to the class A felony of robbery in the first degree, and the unclassified felony of armed criminal action. We affirm.

Background

The State charged Movant with one count of the class A felony of robbery in the first degree and one count of the unclassified felony of armed criminal action. The State charged Movant under a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Weeks v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  3. Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Wedlow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. O'NEAL v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Heller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Wagner v. BowyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Creighton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API