Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:
The sole issue before us on this petition to review portions of regulations of the Food and Drug Administration, 21 C.F.R. §§ 191b.5(e), 191b.-3(e)(2) and 191b.7 (1973), establishing standards for electrically operated toys and other electrically operated articles intended for use by children is whether the determination by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs in promulgating the regulations was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law”. 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A) (1970). We hold it was not. We deny the petition to review.
On…
2Cited by39 opinions
- United States Lines, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Jayvee Brand, Inc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- South Carolina ex rel. Tindal v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- National Nutritional Foods Association v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.