Legal Opinion

Van Sickle v. Melton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 13, 1978PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Denman, J., not participating. Memorandum: Petitioner, Peter W. Van Sickle, instituted this article 78 proceeding to review a determination of respondent, James P. Melton, State Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, revoking petitioner’s motor' vehicle operator’s license. The proof before the hearing referee revealed that the police had reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner was driving while intoxicated and that his arrest and the warning given him met the requirements of section 1194 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner admitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Di Girolamo v. MeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Kennedy v. MeltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MassongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Baker v. STATE DEPT. OF REVENUE, MVDColorado Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Johnson v. AdduciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Miracle v. New York State Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. DavisNew York Supreme Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API