Aames Funding Corp. v. Houston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
A notice of pendency is valid for three years from the date of filing. A party seeking to extend a notice of pendency for an additional three-year period must first make a showing of good cause (see CPLR 6513; Matter of Sakow, 97 NY2d 436, 442 [2002]; RKO Props., Ltd. v Boymelgreen, 31 AD 3d 625 [2006]). Here, the plaintiff established good cause for extending the notice of pendency by showing that the instant foreclosure action *809was automatically stayed as a result of one of the appellants having filed for bankruptcy (see Stassou v Casini & Huang Constr., 203 AD2d 357 [1994]).
The appellants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Ass'n v. MastropaoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In Re the Estate of SakowNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Abbas v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Aames Funding Corp. v. HoustonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. EroboboAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PietranicoNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Lot 57 Acquisition Corp. v. Yat Yar Equities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Strong Is. Contr. Corp. v. PadillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Citibank, N.A. v. HerreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.