Legal Opinion

Bowers v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1925No. 16148, 16161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeotles, C. J.

1. A servant assumes tlie ordinary risks of his employment, and is bound to exercise liis own skill and diligence to protect himself. In a suit by a servant against his master for personal injuries arising from the negligence of the master in furnishing him alleged defective and unsafe machinery, the plaintiff can not recover unless it appears that the master knew, or ought to have known, of the defects or danger in the machinery supplied, and unless it also appears that the servant injured did not know, and had not equal means of knowing such fact, and by the exercise of ordinary care could…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Niblett v. LaGrange MillsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  2. Williams v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stone v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Atlanta, Birmingham & Coast Railroad v. MullisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Swails v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Southern Ry. Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  5. Swails v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API