Khadafy Kareem Mullens v. State of Florida

LEWIS, J,, specially

concurring.

I agree with the conclusions reached by the Court today. However, I write to express my concern that this decision should not in any way be understood to eliminate or undermine the legal procedures regarding the admission of nontesti-monial evidence. See Johnson v. State, 660 So.2d 637, 645 (Fla.1995) (“The rules of evidence may be relaxed during the penalty phase of a capital trial, but they emphatically are not to be completely ignored.”); see also § 921.141(1), Fla. Stat. (2008) (“[T]his subsection shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any…