Legal Opinion

Brewer v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided June 9, 1993No. 05-91-02125-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

The sole issue before us in this appeal is whether the evidence is sufficient to support a rational jury finding that Edward James Brewer was guilty as a party to an aggravated robbery committed by another. Because we conclude that the evidence is sufficient, we affirm.

When analyzing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court must first determine the legal theory of criminal responsibility under which the application paragraph of the charge properly authorizes the jury to convict. See Chatman v. State, 846 S.W.2d 329, 331 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). Only then…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Sharp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Beardsley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Karnes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  2. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Guillory v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
  4. Gilchrest v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Folly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API