Legal Opinion
Ceasar v. Great Falls Insurance
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 23, 1979No. 7001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORET, Judge.
This is a suit by plaintiff, Louanna Cea-sar, against Great Falls Insurance Company, seeking payment for property damage, etc. arising out of an alleged loss of her automobile, a 1974 Toyota. Great Falls Insurance Company is the comprehensive/collision insurer of the said vehicle. Great Falls filed an answer of general denial and subsequently filed a third party demand against one Graylin Bell who had borrowed plaintiff’s automobile and was driving it at the time of the alleged accident on March 11, 1977. The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s suit, and she has perfected this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Collins v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- MacAluso v. WatsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- BTU Insulators, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ho v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Roy v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Clark v. Clarendon Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Daigle v. Travelers Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Dinh Ho v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003