Legal Opinion
Mancini v. Scott
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided February 7, 2000PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for a judgment as a matter of law or for a new trial, see M.R. Civ. P. 50, 59, and from an award of attorney fees in a case involving a lease between lessor Anthony Mancini, 1 and lessees Elizabeth Scott, Ann Hasey, and Margaret Saunders. Hasey 2 contends that the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) erred in not granting the Rule 50 or 59 motion, arguing that there was no evidence that she was obligated as a lessee under the lease at the time of its breach because she had not signed the renewal of the lease. Hasey further…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Poussard v. Commercial Credit Plan, Incorporated of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Burleigh v. WeeksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Town of Freeport v. Ocean Farms of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Estate of MouckereziSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pine Ridge Realty, Inc. v. Massachusetts Bay InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- James N. Levis v. Gustav KonitzkySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
- Villas by the Sea Owners Ass'n v. GarritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- McTeague v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Mariculture v. Under-Lloyds of Lond, No. Cv 98 0163762 S (Jun. 4, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.