Legal Opinion

Carnicelli v. Miller Brewing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff Samuel V. Carnicelli, an employee of the Chapman Corporation (Chapman), was injured while working on the demolition and reconstruction of the bottle furnace at defendant Miller Brewing Company’s (Miller) bottling plant in Auburn. At the time of his injury, plaintiff was using a gas torch to cut reinforcing rod in the concrete floor on the second level of Miller’s facility. During the course of the demolition, open areas of the floor were exposed to the first…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Groves v. Land's End Housing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Vincent v. IndustriesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robertti v. ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Klos v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Sponholz v. Benderson Property Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Becerra v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Skinner v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API