Legal Opinion

Riemensberger's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1905No. Appeal, No. 193PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1905, by John Stolz and Catharine Stolz, from decree of O. C. Bucks Co., Sept. T., 1905, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Jacob Riemensberger, deceased. Exceptions to report of Jerome Fackenthall, Esq., auditor. Stout, P. J., filed the following opinion : John Stolz and Catharine Stolz, the claimants, are husband and wife.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 193, Oct. T., 1905, by John Stolz and Catharine Stolz, from decree of O. C. Bucks Co., Sept. T., 1905, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in Estate of Jacob Riemensberger, deceased. Exceptions to report of Jerome Fackenthall, Esq., auditor. Stout, P. J., filed the following opinion : John Stolz and Catharine Stolz, the claimants, are husband and wife. Catherine Stolz is a sister of the deceased, and her husband, John Stolz, is the administrator of his estate. In filing his administrator’s account, John Stolz took credit for three payments to himself and his wife for board,…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Ctteiam,

In bis account as administrator John Stolz took credit for three payments to himself and his wife Catharine as follows: John Stolz, services five years, $500 ; John Stolz, board and nursing, $300; Catharine Stolz, services six years, $600. In an opinion filed upon exceptions to the report of the auditor appointed to pass upon exceptions to the account, to restate the account if necessary, and to make distribution of the balance remaining in the hands of the administrator, the court dismissed the exceptions to the second item above mentioned for board and nursing, sustained the…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Douglas v. BeebeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API