R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Andy R. Allen Sr., as Personal Rep. etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentOsterhaus, J.
I would reverse for a new trial beqause the foreman of the jury did not disclose his contempt for cigarette companies when asked directly during voir dire. When asked during voir dire, “What, if any, opinion do you have of cigarette companies, including [Defendants]?” the juror answered only: “[T]hey are a business.” What the juror didn’t reveal was his history of posting sharply negative' views about tobacco companies on social media. Online, he called them leeches and slaveholders who keep addicts in chains. Appellants only discovered the jury foreman’s strong views about them after the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Loftin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- De La Rosa v. ZequeiraSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Roberts Ex Rel. Estate of Roberts v. TejadaSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of Florida · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.