In re Young
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
HAERLE, J., Dissenting.—
I respectfully dissent. I believe that the majority’s opinion (1) substantially ignores the standard of review that we are required to give to decisions of the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) under our Supreme Court’s most recent, and clearly now controlling, decision of In re Shaputis (2011) 53 Cal.4th 192 [134 Cal.Rptr.3d 86, 265 P.3d 253] (Shaputis II) and (2) also either ignores or discards the several other factors (i.e., the factors in addition to the conceded “egregious nature” of the offense) (see maj. opn., ante, at pp. 317-319) which clearly establish there…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In re LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re ShaputisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In re MimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012