United States v. Fairall
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, Circuit Judge.
If it is proper to treat the distributed assets of a dissolved corporation as a trust fund for creditors, plainly there can be no need of getting judgment against the corporation as a condition precedent to a suit like this. Where there is a trust, the creditor may follow the res, without more, Case v. Beauregard, 101 U. S. 688, 25 L. Ed. 1004. That was the theory on which Updike v. U. S., 8 F.(2d) 913 ,(C. C. A. 8), proceeded, and, so far as the doctrine of the trust fund is valid, the result is- inescapable. In spite of the impressive authority back of that doctrine, I…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Case v. BeauregardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Updike v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Williams v. Adler-Goldman Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Bank of Commerce & Trusts of Richmond v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Kuckenberg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Newcomb v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- United States v. Genevieve RussellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.