O'Connor v. Pawling & Harnischfeger Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.
The rulings sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the cross-complaint and the order denying appellant the remedy of an examination before trial of an employee of the railway company in attempted compliance with sec. 4096, Stats., are based upon the proposition asserted bjr respondent that the appellant cannot or ought not to be compelled to have determined in this action any questions concerning any possible adjustment between the defendants themselves of any liability that may be found in favor of plaintiff.
This view is predicated upon what it is claimed was decided by this court in Bakula v.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bakula v. SchwabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Liebhauser v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- O'Connor v. Pawling & Harnischfeger Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- Frederickson v. SchaumburgerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933