Legal Opinion
Southerlin v. Automotive Electronics Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1988No. 87CA0138PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRISWELL, Judge.
The defendants, Automotive Electronics Corporation (Automotive) and John W. New, appeal from the order of the district court denying their motion under C.R.C.P. 60 to set aside a default judgment. We reverse.
This litigation had its genesis in a promissory note, secured by a deed of trust, executed by plaintiffs and made payable to Automotive. Plaintiffs having defaulted on their obligations under that note, Automotive commenced foreclosure proceedings through the public trustee and sought a court order under C.R.C.P. 120 authorizing the sale of the secured property.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- United States v. BosurgiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. BosurgiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Biella v. State Department of HighwaysColorado Court of Appeals · 1982
- Civil Service Commission v. DoyleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Bank of Telluride v. FleisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Denman v. Great Western Railway Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Costin Engineering Consultants, Inc. v. LathamDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Colony Insurance Company v. Bristlecone Montessori SchoolDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- In Re The Marriage Of: Lucinda Carpenter, V Bradley CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.