Legal Opinion

Macy v. Wood

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1912No. 7,510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Cross-complaint by.Rebecca Wood against William W. Macy. Prom a decree in favor of cross-complainant, cross-defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This action was originally instituted by Orla A. Macy against appellee Rebecca Wood and her husband, to enjoin a threatened trespass. Upon motion of appellee Rebecca Wood, appellant was made a party defendant, whereupon said appellee filed a cross-complaint against appellant and said Orla A. Macy, alleging that she is the owner in fee simple of the following described lands in Randolph county; Indiana: “Eighteen acres off the south end of forty acres off of the north end of the east half of the southeast quarter of section one, township twenty-one north, range thirteen east,” and asking that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Puterbaugh v. PuterbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Seymour Water Co. v. City of SeymourIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Reid v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gwinn v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Carmody v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ault v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API