Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 30, 1999No. Civ.A. 98-11511-GAOPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
O’TOOLE, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner David Rowe, an alien currently in the custody of the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the ground that he is being detained without bond in violation of his constitutional rights. After review, the Court concludes that Rowe’s detention is not unlawful, and accordingly, his petition is DENIED.
I. Factual Background
Rowe is a native and citizen of Jamaica. He lawfully entered the United States as a nonimmigrant visitor for pleasure in December, 1990, authorized…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States of America Ex Rel. Mamdouh Barbour v. District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, San Antonio, Texas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Tam v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
- Hermanowski v. FarquharsonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barton v. AshcroftDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Jankowski v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Fierro v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
- Rumierz v. INSDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1999