Legal Opinion

Muir v. Kay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1925No. 4236PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

The appellants, the defendants below, own lands in section 1, township 11 north, etc., in Box Elder county, Utah; respondents, plaintiffs below, in the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of section 12 adjoining section 1 on the south. Both sections formerly were owned toy a common grantor, the Utah-Idaho Sugar Company. When conveyances at different times were made by it of the several tracts or parcels of land in both sectio.ns, a strip of ground 2 rods in width was either reserved in the grant or not granted at all, on all sides of the sections, and a strip running through the center…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. First National Bank v. TysonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  3. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  4. O'Brien v. Central Iron & Steel Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Block v. Salt Lake Rapid Transit Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandlin v. BlanchardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Barrett v. HandNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Adney v. State Road Com. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API