Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Parr (In Re Parr)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1998No. 19-50075Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GREGORY F. KISHEL, Bankruptcy Judge.

This adversary proceeding came on before the Court on June 2, 1998, upon the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. The Plaintiff appeared by her attorney, Sarah J. Fagg. The Defendant appeared by her attorney, William L. Bodensteiner. Upon the parties’ stipulation of fact and the memoran-da and arguments submitted by counsel, the Court grants the Plaintiffs motion, denies the Defendant’s motion, and denies the Defendant a discharge under Chapter 7 in BKY 97-34797.

The Plaintiff, as United States…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
  3. W.S.A., Inc., D/B/A Harmon Contract v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Schirmer v. Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board (In Re Schirmer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API