Legal Opinion

Eddie J. Suber v. Michael Calhoun

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 7, 2019No. 2:19-cv-06593Unknown

1Opinion

JS-6 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EDDIE ]. SUBER, Jr., et al., CASE NUMBER: 10 11 CV 19-6593-CAS (AGRx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || MICHAEL CALHOUN, et al., ORDER REMANDING CASE TO 14 STATE COURT 15 Defendant(s), 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 | County of Los Angeles for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 |/ court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Great Northern Railway Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API