Rosenberg v. Pubnico Realty Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order granting motion to dismiss an action for failure to prosecute modified by striking therefrom the words “ unless the plaintiff causes the ease to be placed on the calendar for the December, 1939, term of this court for trial, and pays the sum of Ten Dollars ($10) costs to the defendant;” and, as thus modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. (Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp., 256 App. Div. 833; Gellman v. Coulawtas, 253 id. 910; Wheeler v. Duell, 230 id. 392.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor .tod Close, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Farber v. Broadco Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by3 opinions
- Granich v. StolovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Fass v. GreenbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Morton v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940