Legal Opinion
In re Hydrocarbon Chemicals, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 13, 1969No. Nos. 16787, 16788PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT
GANEY, Circuit Judge.
The appellants here are claiming compensation for services allegedly beneficial to the bankrupt estate rendered as attorneys for the debtor. Robert Fried-lander who, for reasons not relevant here, was denied all compensation in connection with the proceedings, filed a petition under Chapter XI and, as counsel for the debtor, employed Leo Neiwirth, Samuel S. Starr, Meyer Weinberg and Edwin Fradkin as his counsel in connection therewith. At the inception of the proceedings under Chapter XI, Harry A. Margolis was appointed receiver on the 10th day of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Progress Lektro Shave CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Gochenour v. Cleveland Terminals Bldg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Albers v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- In Re National Tool & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- In the Matter of Cle-Ware Industries, Inc., Debtor. Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. v. Howard SokolskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- In the Matter of Arkansas Company, Inc., a New York Corporation, Debtor. Appeal of Benenson & Scher, P.A., Attorneys for the Creditors Committee of Arkansas Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In re SingsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.