Legal Opinion

Plunkett v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 14, 1923No. B-103PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Judge

This is a suit to recover the difference in pay between that of a rear admiral of the lower half of the grade and that of the upper half of the grade. The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff was graduated from the Naval Academy in 1886. On April 27,1912, he had attained the rank of captain. On September 6, 1918, plaintiff was appointed a temporary rear admiral in the Navy, to date from July 1,1918. Subsequently, on August 19, 1919, he was appointed a permanent rear admiral and commissioned as such to date from April 7, 1919. On the date of plaintiff’s commission as permanent rear admiral…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Reaves v. AinsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. United States v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brundage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Ronald J. Cornetta v. The United States of America and John Lehman, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  3. Cason v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Alpert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. Henry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API