Adams v. . Reeves
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Practice — Amendment of Record -- 'Security for Costs.. Civil , ACTION, tried at a Special Term of the Superior-Court of G-uileórd County (held in December, 1876,) before Kerr, J. The point decided in this Court involved the exercise of' discretionary- power by His Honor in refusing1 to allow the motion of defendants for additional security for the prosecution of the suit. The facts appear in the opinion. The defendants appealed from the ruling of the Court below.
1Opinion of the CourtEaircloth, J.
At Spring Term, 1876, of Davidson Superior Court, this cause was removed to Guilford County for trial and at the same term the following order was made; ■“ Rule on the plaintiff to give additional security or j ustify the present on or before-of next term of Guil-ford Superior Court.” At Fall Term of the latter Court the plaintiff justified his present security and the rule was •discharged. It was at the same Term suggested by defendant that the order made at Davidson was one for additional security only, and that the Clerk of Davidson County had not entered the order on the docket correctly.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Patterson v. . WaltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Narron v. Union Camp Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Fayetteville Light & Power Co. v. Lessem Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Kenney v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Faison v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.